【英語タイトル】Structural health monitoring Market by Offering (Hardware, Software & Services), Technology (Wired, Wireless), Vertical (Civil Infrastructure, Aerospace & Defense, Energy, Mining), Implementation, Application and Region - Global Forecast to 2029
	・商品コード：SE 3865 ・発行会社（調査会社）：MarketsandMarkets ・発行日：2024年4月 ・ページ数：約240 ・レポート言語：英語 ・レポート形式：PDF ・納品方法：Eメール（受注後1営業日） ・調査対象地域：グローバル ・産業分野：電子

The global structural health monitoring market Size, Share, Industry Growth, Trends & Analysis was valued at USD 2.5 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 4.1 billion by 2029; it is expected to register a CAGR of 10.4% during the forecast period. Aging infrastructure, increased infrastructure investment, and stringent safety regulations are among the major factors driving the growth of the Structural health monitoring for preventive maintenance and risk mitigation. Advancements in sensor technology, data analytics, and machine learning enhance monitoring capabilities, enabling real-time anomaly detection and predictive maintenance. Integration with building information modeling (BIM) further enhances monitoring, analysis, and decision-making throughout a structure’s lifecycle.

Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Dynamics

Driver: Government regulations pertaining to sustainable structures

Catastrophic failure of structures not only poses a risk to public safety but also leads to heavy monetary losses. For instance, the failure of dams can lead to the impairment of other structures such as bridges, roads, and water systems, resulting in risk to life as well as monetary losses. To improve public safety, such risks related to structures must be reduced. Hence, most governments around the world are focused on improving communication and coordination across governing agencies, developing tools based on advanced technology, promoting emergency action plans (EAP), and modifying regulatory policies to ensure the safety of infrastructure. Regulations, such as those outlined in the Guiding Principles for Sustainable Federal Buildings, emphasize the importance of energy efficiency, water conservation, indoor environmental quality, materials sustainability, and resilience in building design, construction, and operation. In US, building energy codes are established by the US Department of Energy, often based on ASHRAE standards, with many states and municipalities adopting these codes or implementing even stricter energy efficiency requirements. In the European Union, ambitious energy performance regulations target near-zero energy buildings by 2050, while regulations promote sustainable materials through recycled content and forestry practices. In India, the government promotes green building practices through the Energy Conservation Building Code (ECBC) and incentivizes LEED certification, alongside public procurement policies encouraging sustainable construction in government buildings.By mandating sustainable practices, government regulations ensure that structures are built and maintained to high-performance standards, reducing environmental impact, conserving resources, and promoting occupant health and safety. Compliance with these regulations often necessitates the implementation of SHM strategies to monitor the structural health, performance, and sustainability of buildings over time. Therefore, government regulations play a crucial role in driving the adoption of SHM practices to meet sustainability requirements, enhance building performance, and ensure the long-term viability of structures in alignment with regulatory mandates.

Restraint: High Implementation Costs

Installing and maintaining Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems can be a costly endeavor, with expenses varying based on several factors. The cost is influenced by the size and complexity of the structure being monitored, as larger or more intricate buildings may require a greater number of sensors and more sophisticated monitoring systems. Additionally, the type and quantity of sensors needed, along with the chosen data acquisition and analysis platform, contribute to the overall cost of implementing an SHM system. This variability in costs can pose a significant barrier for smaller structures or projects with limited budgets, potentially limiting their ability to invest in comprehensive SHM solutions. The financial implications associated with SHM highlight the importance of considering budget constraints and cost-effectiveness when planning for the installation and maintenance of monitoring systems, especially for smaller structures or projects with restricted financial resources.

Global Structural Health Monitoring Market Ecosystem Analysis

Prominent companies in this market include well-established, financially stable providers of structural health monitoring services. These companies have been operating in the market for several years and possess a diversified product and software & service portfolio, state-of-the-art technologies, and strong global sales and marketing networks. Prominent companies in this market include COWI A/S (Denmark), Campbell Scientific (US), Geokon (US), Nova Metrix LLC (US), SGS SA (Switzerland), Trimble Inc. (US), Structural Monitoring Systems PLC (Australia), Sixense (France), Digitexx Data Systems, Inc. (US), and Acellent Technologies, Inc. (US)